By Selwyn Duke

It seems that judicial adventurism is as old as our republic itself.
Lamenting such usurpation, Thomas Jefferson once said, "The original
error [was in] establishing a judiciary independent of the nation, and
which, from the citadel of the law, can turn its guns on those they
were meant to defend, and control and fashion their proceedings to its
own will."

Committing this transgression on a state level, the
California Supreme Court has, by a 4-to-3 decision, divined a right to
homosexual "marriage" in the constitution it has sworn to uphold. In
making the ruling, the court cited a 60-year-old precedent overturning
a state ban on interracial marriages. But this is a false equivalence,
as it ignores the definition of marriage.

Read the rest here.