By Selwyn Duke

George Mason University economics professor Walter Williams has penned another excellent article, this time about socialized medicine.  And since he relates the truth, it’s not a pretty picture.  He talks about how the health-care systems in Britain, Canada and Sweden are running on fumes, and in particular I call your attention to the following paragraph:

“OK, Williams,” you say, “Sweden is the world’s socialist wonder.” Sven R. Larson tells about some of Sweden’s problems in “Lesson from Sweden’s Universal Health System: Tales from the Health-care Crypt,” published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (Spring 2008). Mr. D., a Gothenburg multiple sclerosis patient, was prescribed a new drug. His doctor’s request was denied because the drug was 33 percent more expensive than the older medicine. Mr. D. offered to pay for the medicine himself but was prevented from doing so. The bureaucrats said it would set a bad precedent and lead to unequal access to medicine.

I believe it was Winston Churchill who noted that socialism’s one virtue is the equal spreading of misery.  And let’s examine this idea.  To damn some people to infirmity in order to avoid “unequal access to medicine” is not only wrong-headed, it’s evil.  You might as well say that it’s preferable to have all citizens die than just some, all citizens be unhappy than just some, or all citizens suffer privation than just some.  But this is how leftists think. 

Of course, it goes without saying that we’d like all people to live lives of milk and honey, but that isn’t possible.  That is something of Heaven, not this world.  Here we must do two things: Recognize the ideal and strive for it while also accepting the best we can manage at the moment.  To not accept the latter is the mark of a fool, and such a person belongs nowhere near any position of authority.  In fact, he probably belongs in a rubber room.

It’s always amazing how, in the final analysis, leftists are profoundly uncompassionate and live unexamined lives.  Those Swedish bureaucrats, those useless cogs in the machinery of the state, are damning Mr. D. to a diminished life in deference to a principle they would never live up to themselves.  If they or their loved ones were in Mr. D.’s shoes, how many would refuse the more effective medication in the name of equality?  How many commissars in the Soviet Union stood on bread lines for two hours with the common folks?  Yes, it’s very easy to be idealistic when you don’t have to live with your ideals.  Such people are the worst kind of hypocrites.  They are to be despised.

It reminds me of G.K. Chesterton’s saying about how there are really only two kinds of people, “those who accept dogmas and know it and those who accept dogmas and don’t know it.”  These leftists have done the worst of things: They have elevated equality above true virtues, while lowering all virtues to a point where their practice becomes optional.  Life is not fair; it doesn’t prescribe equality.  And it is a very arrogant, ignorant person indeed who thinks he has the right to enforce secular equality doctrine at the end of a gun.  I truly have come to loathe the word “equality.”

Williams also writes:

Malmo, with its 280,000 residents, is Sweden’s third-largest city. To see a physician, a patient must go to one of two local clinics before they can see a specialist. The clinics have security guards to keep patients from getting unruly as they wait hours to see a doctor. The guards also prevent new patients from entering the clinic when the waiting room is considered full. Uppsala, a city with 200,000 people, has only one specialist in mammography. Sweden’s National Cancer Foundation reports that in a few years most Swedish women will not have access to mammography.

If you want to eliminate innovation, the development of new medication, and access to medical care and equipment, socialized medicine is the way to go.  Consider this statistic, for instance: The state of Tennessee has more MRI machines than all of Canada.  And as bad as socialized medicine is in foreign countries, it would be five times the disaster here. 

But, hey, you’ve got to die of something, right?  

                © 2008 Selwyn Duke — All Rights Reserved

Posted in , , , ,

5 responses to “The Dark Truth about Socialized Medicine”

  1. Walt Avatar
    Walt

    What it comes right down to with socialized medicine and socialism in general is the blatant disregard for a wise and often ignored commandment…Thou shall not covet. Once covetousness of others belongings, lifestyle and even health care begins, there is no end. Of course the coveting behavior is usually cloaked in “altruism” and politically correctified with words like equality and fairness. What it comes right down to is one person’s desire for what another person owns. If an individual seeks equality in assets on his own accord we call it theft. If a group of people do it “democratically” we call it socialism. This what you call a “legal injustice.” It all begins with covetousness.

    Like

  2. Shaun Avatar

    Thanks for the article! Would anyone happen to know of a good read breaking down how the nuts and bolts of how socialized medicine works, its pros and cons, etc? Have not found anything helpful as of yet.
    Shaun
    UCA

    Like

  3. Philip France Avatar
    Philip France

    Like Walt and Selwyn Duke, I agree that the concepts of “fairness” and “equality” should have been left on the playground when we entered 7th grade.
    Is it “fair” that I cannot drive a golf ball like Tiger Woods? Is it a matter of equality that I cannot sing like Luciano Pavorotti or even Rod Stewart? Is it “fair” that I cannot express my opinion as eloquently as Selwyn Duke or captivate a listening audience the way that Michael Savage can?
    These concepts are childish. They are preposterous. Furthermore, they can only be implemented and legislated at the point of a gun or the blade of a sword.
    Lastly, God bless Walter Williams; a courageous and genious man who is excoriated by the MSM for “leaving the plantation”.
    I, for one, am completely comfortable and resolved with my understanding of life and eternity. Woe unto those of you who care not why I am so assured.

    Like

  4. Philip France Avatar
    Philip France

    Shaun,
    To answer your question, in the 1960’s LBJ declared a war on poverty. This resulted in more poverty. In the 1970’s the Carter administration established a cabinet Department of Education. This resulted in even further erosion of our educational community. In the 2000’s President Bush outrageously sided with America-hating Senator Ted Kennedy in the “No Child’s Behind Will be Left” Act. When has government (excepting our Military) EVER managed affairs better than the private sector?
    There are some recent articles available at http://www.michaelsavage.com that show that Great Britain has denied its citizens treatment for ailments because their National (Socialized) Health care considers it too expensive. Beaurocrats in moldy sweaters deciding your health remedies. The evidence abounds.
    Let me oversimplify here: Imagine that your automobile is equipped to be run by a government while you are behind the wheel. Would you rather:
    a) Drive the car yourself.
    b) Have your city counselors and/or mayor (who are seemingly familiar with the traffic patterns, dangerous curves, etc.) operate it.
    c) Beaurocrats in Washington D.C. operate it.
    I rest my case.

    Like

  5. Shaun Avatar

    Phillip,
    I agree with you 100% and have absolutely no faith in our government to administer social programs whatsoever. If anything, socialized medicine will be used to enslave people in one sort or another by forcing them to abide by Gov. regulations in order to receive proper treatment(what treatment they can get). I was asking if there were any good reads on analyzing health care systems of the modern world i.e Sweden vs USA…something like that. I’m not too familiar with the problems our system faces today and what some of the propositions by liberals entail. It is one area I am not very strong on and would like to improve. Thanks for the reply though.
    Shaun UCA

    Like

Let us know what you think, dear reader. We value your input!