By Selwyn Duke

Imagine you go to the polls and choose Mitt Romney on an
electronic machine, but your vote comes up Barack Obama. So you re-enter your
choice, but the president’s name still stubbornly appears. Then a third try.
Ditto.

Innocent malfunction…or something else?

Whatever the case, this has already happened to voters in states
such as Nevada, Ohio,
Kansas,
North
Carolina, Missouri, and Colorado — four of which are swing states.

This hasn’t escaped the notice of the Republican National
Committee, which has just sent
a letter outlining its concerns to the secretaries of state of the
aforementioned. The RNC’s chief counsel, John Phillipe, wrote that he
understands how “the causes of this problem are varied, and include
miscalibration and hyper-sensitivity of the machines,” verbiage diplomatic
enough to avoid being branded a (paranoid) life form from another “inhabited
planet,” as a complaint-barraged and incredulous North Carolina elections
official put
it. As for where this puts me, I guess I’m suspicious enough to be targeted
by the Men in Black.

I’ll make my case. First, all these stories about
uncooperative machines involve votes switched in only one direction: Barack
Obama’s. Would this be possible if at issue were merely innocent errors?

If it isn’t true that these malfunctions are curiously
monolithic in favor of the president, then where are the news stories to that
effect? After all, if Obama votes were switched to Romney ones anywhere, the reliably liberal
mainstream media would certainly make it front-page news. But have you gotten
wind of such happenings? If so, I’d like to hear about it — honestly. It would
be mind-easing.

Next, we’ve all used ATMs, and most everyone (except my
quasi-Luddite self) has something such as an iPod. Now, have you ever, anytime,
anywhere, had one of these electronic devices switch data input on you? So how
is it that in our high-tech universe of flawlessly functioning electronic
gadgets, voting machines are the only ones prone to human-like “error”? If
there’s an explanation other than human meddling, again, I’d truly like to hear
it. Experts, feel free to weigh in.

Lastly, while electronics may not be my forte, I do know
something about man’s nature. And the nature of the man known as the leftist
has been on full display this election cycle. Consider the OWS protesters who
vandalized property, littered grounds, and committed rape and theft; the
Democrat partisans who key people’s cars, steal Romney/Ryan signs (happened to
someone close to me), and beat
up Republicans; the Democrat operative caught
on video facilitating vote fraud; the liberals who wanted
to kill a conservative 6-year-old; and the progressive septuagenarian who
told a conservative 12-year-old he
should have been aborted. These actions — just a small sampling of many —
reflect well the situational-values set, people who are beneath contempt and above
nothing.

Now let’s apply logic. Some of the technicians calibrating electronic
voting machines are liberals, and it follows that some percentage of them must
be cut from the above stone. After all, does anyone really think that leftist
political manipulation and bullying stop at the border separating low-tech and
high-tech crime?

This election is within the margin of fraud, and I’ve
already made my predictions and written
that vote manipulators can, with little question,
steal it for Obama. And here is how we could know on Nov. 7: watch the exit polls. Exit polling is a precise
enough science so that states can be called for one candidate or another based
on it. Thus, if this data shows a Romney win in a state but it nonetheless goes
for Obama, it will be a clue that the living-constitution types have given us a
living vote count along with a dying republic.

     Contact
Selwyn Duke or follow him on
Twitter

       © 2012 Selwyn Duke — All Rights Reserved