By Selwyn Duke

Again proving why George Orwell’s dystopian story 1984 was set in Britain, the English are contemplating even more efforts at thought control.  They are proposing legislation that could make it illegal to tell jokes about homosexuals and want to make offenses against the elderly "hate crimes."

I’ve written much about hate crime/hate speech laws and don’t feel inclined to restate my arguments against them here.  If interested, you can read one of my many pieces on the subjects. 

What I will say is that applying hate crime penalties to those who target the elderly makes a mockery of even the alleged purpose of this category of law.  We know that criminals will train their sights on older people, as the latter are particularly easy prey.  And predators should be punished harshly.  But to imply that these criminals are motivated by some special animosity for senior citizens is stupid even by statist standards.  Of course, the proponents of hate crime laws aren’t really driven by logic or reason but, rather, by social engineering imperatives and what feels right at the moment.

In a way, though, it may actually be a good thing if the list of victim groups expands inexorably.  Once most everyone is included, we’ll have moved closer to the solution I’ve proposed.  To wit: If we want a greater degree of punishment for hate crimes because it will more effectively deter the behavior, why not just apply those consequences across the board?  After all, if they’re not effective, why waste time applying them to hate crimes?  But if they are effective, shouldn’t we want to fight all violent crime effectively? 

There are only two reasons why this eminently logical solution is rejected by those on the left.  First, on an emotional level they truly despise certain ideas and want to be able to make statements — in the media, in schools and through the criminal justice system — reflecting their godly determinations.  Second, they want latitude to be able to punish what they view as "victimizer groups" harshly while giving what they see as "victim groups" a slap on the wrist.  This cannot be done as easily if you only judge the acts committed.  But if you allow yourself the luxury of divining what a perpetrator’s motivations might have been, if you set yourself up as a clairvoyant who can sense "hate," this becomes very easy.  Why, we know those infernal ice people are irredeemably hateful.  Don’t you know that?  Doesn’t everybody?

And you can’t achieve true justice without astuteness like that.

Posted in , , ,

5 responses to “More Hate Laws”

  1. jared mannerhorn Avatar

    Hate laws! I sure do hate laws. We have too many laws. There should be a law that there can only be 1000 laws and everytime you make a new law you have to get one of the old laws. Every law takes away a little bit of freedom. So yes I hate laws.

    Like

  2. Rich Avatar
    Rich

    Ayn Rand, we need her more than ever.

    Like

  3. Ray Hicks Avatar
    Ray Hicks

    To my thinking, there is nothing wrong with increasing the penalty for crimes that are particularly heinous. There are already differing degrees of Murder, with a corresponding variance in sentencing ranges.
    Everyone would agree that crimes against children, the elderly and the infirmed deserve an increased penalty. Offenses perpratrated against someone because of race or ethnic origin also deserve a harsher response from society.
    One does not have to be a clairvoyant to figure out that; if an offender wearing a brown shirt and swastika armband beats up a Hasidic rabbi on the anniversary of Kristallnacht, that the offender was motivated by something other than opportunity.
    There are assaults. And there are assaults. Some are worse than others. Racially motivated attacks are a greater threat to society than bar fights. Robbery of a pensioner for his Social Security check is worse than one drug dealer robbing another. All apples aren’t apples and all oranges aren’t orange.
    A thief who busts out a company and steals retirement funds is not the same as the thief who runs off with someone’s car. Some deserve a special place in hell. Some deserve more time in prison. Nothing wrong with that.

    Like

  4. John Avatar
    John

    Ray I think you ought to read Duke’s articles on the subject, they can really change your mind. He’s right, hate laws are thought control.

    Like

  5. Sticks n Stones Avatar
    Sticks n Stones

    I agree with John. I’ve read Mr. Duke’s articles on racial profiling and hate crimes. Both changed my opinions that I had held to be correct.
    Keep up the good work, Mr. Duke! The truth needs to be told.

    Like

Leave a reply to Rich Cancel reply