By Selwyn Duke

Well, Al Sharpton, a lowlife’s lowlife, is at it again.  Now he’s threatening to "close down" New York City because the three officers charged in the Sean Bell shooting were acquitted.  In other words, they weren’t lynched the way Sharpton would have preferred.

For those of you who don’t know, Sean Bell was a black man who was shot by three police officers (two of whom were also black) outside a Queens strip club on his wedding day after using his car as a deadly weapon.  You can read more about the case here.

A big issue in the case has been the fact that the police fired 50 bullets at the car during their defensive action; this, as you might imagine, has been seized upon and used to demonize the cops by Sharpton and his enablers in the media.  However, insofar as the people making hay out of this are honest, it’s simply indicative of their ignorance of firearms and of the realities of life and death situations.

When you fire a semi-automatic gun (note that semi-automatic simply means that one bullet is fired every time the trigger is pulled), you can discharge a 30-round magazine in a matter of seconds.  (You can believe me on this, as I’ve done enough recreational shooting to know.)   This is important to understand because the media would give the impression that the officers were pumping rounds into the vehicle relentlessly.  The truth is that, with three cops firing simultaneously, the shooting would have been over in seconds.

Also understand the frame of mind someone is in during what he perceives to be a life-or-death situation.  He has someone taking serious violent action against him and has to react, and if he hesitates, it may spell the end for him, his colleagues and/or innocent bystanders.  Moreover, real life isn’t a movie; there is no Dirty Harry to shoot a bad guy between the eyes with one shot.  In the real world, it’s very hard to shoot a handgun accurately during a high stress situation with a moving and resisting target.  Thus, you fire off a volley of shots.  Once you determine that deadly force is warranted, you commit to the decision and make sure you stop the attacker.

These are the kinds of facts that even the limp-wristed capons in the mainstream media could figure out if they actually tried to learn about the subject matter they treated and applied reason.  As for Sharpton,  I don’t think there’s much doubt that he lives for these events.  It’s a great way for him to get face time; he trades on such things.  If he couldn’t invent injustice, he wouldn’t have a career.

Yet he does incalculable harm to black people, who he claims to represent, and to the wider society.  Some of the sheeple following him were shouting "Kill the police!"  Does this do any good for the nation?  He is only intensifying the climate of distrust of police that exists in the black community — a climate that racial hustlers like him created in the first place, mind you.   And he is making black folks even more bitter and angry, thereby increasing the chances that they will commit crimes and be defiant with the police.  Thus, his actions also increase the chances that black people will be hurt by the men in blue.

Then, of course, it’s only a matter of time before Sharpton instigates another riot in which people are killed.  He did this years ago, although you’d never know it by his behavior, as he exhibits no desire whatsoever to expiate his great sins.  He is truly a contemptible individual.

                         Protected by Copyright

Posted in , ,

10 responses to “Al Sharpton at it Again”

  1. democrat Avatar
    democrat

    This is a tragedy no matter how you look at it. If this man only had a cell phone and brandished no gun and the cops killed him anyway, then they should be on death row just like the criminals they arrest. This country, and especially in NYC, is slowly becoming a police-state that will limit the rights of the citizens if we are not careful. If Michael Vick can go to prison for killing some dogs, which is a bad thing but not in any way equivallent to human life, then these cops should surely go to prison for killing a man. This is senseless. All of the evidence that was used to acquit these “animals” was after-the-fact information. When those cops pulled up on these guys, they had no idea that they had criminal records, instead, they assumed. These are supposed to be professionals and not bullies hiding behind a badge. Karma will catch up to them though rest assured.

    Like

  2. republican Avatar
    republican

    You’re right, democrat. This is America, dammit, and we should be free to get drunk and repeatedly slam our cars into police officers without consequence — It’s what the founding fathers would have wanted!

    Like

  3. Third Position Avatar
    Third Position

    Don’t you guys ever just get tired?

    Like

  4. Outraged Avatar
    Outraged

    Police have no right to shoot first and ask questions later. It is social injustice.!!!!!! It’s the age old excuse that they constantly make and try to justify the killing of a person.
    I understand that there are many great officers that are excellent in their field and they are great community leaders. Kudos to those officers that are doing their jobs the right way! However, there are many that have not been trained properly and they want to take a rambo approach in dealing with potential problems. Although, I’m not a black man – I know many and regardless of their education and social status – if faced with the wrong police officer(s), they could be killed for doing nothing other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time. It has been a problem forever and it needs to change.
    Yes, a police officer needs to protect himself. But in the Sean Bell and many other cases what were they protecting themselves from?
    For the record police brutality is the intentional use of excessive physical force by a police officer, prison officer or other law enforcement officer. It may be carried out at the initiative of an individual officer, or in response to orders given to the officer, or in response to governmental or administrative policies. Brutality is taking the life of someone unarmed! It was more than accident. Police officers decided that they would rather nurture a “new militarized style of policing” where “confrontation has replaced investigation.” It’s wrong to kill another based on a preconceived notion of their race, religion, politics, or socioeconomic status.
    The officers were wrong in their approach to resolve the supposedly conflict. Go tell Bell’s kids that it was just a mistake. It is sad for both sides. But this is a reality that is prevalent in many communities. People are tired of the lack of concern for human life that some not ALL police officers take.
    There needs to be new training that addresses race, religion, politics and socioeconomics in the community and police officers need to change with the times and be more accountable for their actions. There is a solution but no one wants to address it because it’s just killing those criminals or potential criminals. It’s just minorities. Only when the lines are crossed and innocent white boys are killed will the Government and the Nation try to make change. But as people of color we are tired of the social injustice done every day to people on the streets just because there are some police officers that are insensitive to our communities.
    It is your viewpoint that has put the US in this superficial society where the poor get poorer and rich get richer. Where yes even a man can be shot the night before his wedding and killed for no reason at all. Wow that my Republican is the world that we live in. Sure there are imaginary boundary lines and oppression is spread out every day to people of color.
    Human life is priceless. Do you know how much the cops were drinking that night? No you don’t and you never will. Because the victims were black and according to one judge the death and injuries were justified. That is why the people of NYC and every other city should be OUTRAGED. Not for a riot but take a stand make a change happened by using what little power we have. Our dollar!!! We can make difference. I hope that many realize the power of their dollar and that they take a stand against injustice!
    Republican – not sure of your race, religion, socioeconomic background but I bet if you feared the cops because of the many social injustice that was done in your life to you or family and friends then you would have a very different viewpoint on this social unjust issue.
    Tired of the social injustices done every day!

    Like

  5. republican Avatar
    republican

    I’m still scratching my head trying to figure out what the “injustice” committed here was. This man assaulted police with his car not once, not twice, but three times (the van twice, the undercover officer once). The officers only had a moment to react – they had no idea what the driver’s intention was, nor of his race (it was probably too dark to see the driver). Their lives and those of their brothers-in-arms were in immediate danger, and they did what their instincts and training told them to do. What was their alternative — To allow the man to ram them again, possibly killing some among them, and then speed off? Remember, DUI and vehicular assault are major crimes, and have been for a long time. But then again, those laws were no doubt written by rich, white males to keep the black man down, right?
    For the record, I am a white male. Although I feel sorry for the family of the man killed, I feel the police officers acted appropriately. If I did what Sean Bell did, I’d expect to get shot as well. Playing the race card in this case just makes no sense, in any case, since several of the police officers acquitted were black.

    Like

  6. Third Position Avatar
    Third Position

    There is something about this dialog that brings to mind the quote…“The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity.”

    Like

  7. sanspays Avatar
    sanspays

    Would all the race-card players please go walk a few thousand beats yourselves, with a few hundred Sean Bell’s crossing your paths? Your Marxist propaganda does not persuade. It disgusts. Be very careful, comrades. You are riding a tiger and the dismount will likely not be one you would have chosen. History throughout the world has shown this repeatedly time and again.
    Please, use your heads, not your emotions, nor your prejudices. Reason, Reason, REASON. Truth is Not relative. Morality is Not relative. And 2 plus 2 still makes 4. It always will.
    I leave you with a comment from one of your fellow travelers who also bought into the same dialectical race-baiting you have and (par for the course) had to learn the hard way, the truth behind the ideological conflict he became so immersed in. He, too, believed he was fighting for freedom, justice, equality, and all those oft-repeated warm and fuzzy euphemisms being spoon fed you daily. There is no utopia nor heaven on earth FOR ANYONE. There never has been and there never will be. You fight for and illusion. For Potemkin. And and you are literally rattling your chains, and your loved ones, along that path.
    “None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free.” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago, 1918-1956

    Like

  8. republican Avatar
    republican

    “There is something about this dialog that brings to mind the quote…’The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity.’”
    Good point — I, for one, would like to live in a world where nobody cared about anything or anyone.

    Like

  9. KD. Avatar
    KD.

    “White Boys”….?? Huh Outraged? And you wonder why.

    Like

  10. primorsky Avatar
    primorsky

    sanspays,
    1. That Solzhenitsyn quote cuts both ways.
    2. Since you brought it up, and it has been debated since it was first asked, “What is truth?

    Like

Leave a reply to republican Cancel reply