By Selwyn Duke
There are two more things I want to mention about Michael Savage’s comments on Autism and my subsequent commentary. First, Savage has now addressed the matter at his website, and his explanation vindicates my interpretation of what he said. But more on that in a moment. Second, after talking to a friend who scoffed at the idea that Autism could be misdiagnosed, it occurred to me where a great source of confusion lies.
When many of you think of Autism, you imagine an individual with severe developmental problems. This certainly is what Autism once described, but it’s no longer that simple. The psychiatric community has created different categories of Autism, some of which involve symptoms that are relatively mild. Consequently, diagnosing "Autism" is sometimes a dubious endeavor. Not all cases where such a diagnosis is rendered involve the full-blown Autism you might envision; some are no doubt just behavior problems that are misdiagnosed as a milder form of Autism.
As for Savage’s explanation, you’ll notice that the tone is much different than that of his on-air comments. This is because, as I pointed out in my first piece, radio is a unique medium. From it you cannot expect the kind of measured commentary typical of the written form. Radio is spontaneous; writing is deliberate. You tune in to radio for informative, full-contact commentary. If you want only dry information, you’ll have to read a medical journal.
Here is the first paragraph of Savage’s explanation:
My comments about autism were meant to boldly awaken
parents and children to the medical community’s attempt to label too
many children or adults as "autistic."Just
as some drug companies have overdiagnosed "ADD" and "ADHD" to peddle
dangerous speed-like drugs to children as young as 4 years of age, this
cartel of doctors and drug companies is now creating a national panic
by overdiagnosing "autism, for which there is no definitive medical
diagnosis!
Read the rest here.
Protected by Copyright


Leave a reply to Brad Miller Cancel reply