Better Than Drudge

recent posts

about

Howard Dean: Republicans the “White Party”

By Selwyn Duke

So Howard "Dumbo" Dean is at it again.  In the interview excerpt above, he calls the Republican Party the "white party" while touting the inclusiveness of the Democrats. It’s really amazing that the Democratic National Committee allows this buffoon to be their standard bearer.  I mean, he really is the gift that keeps on giving.   

I know the Dumbo Dean type well.  This is a man who grew up in Manhattan, which, given his leftist bent — which is just about as bent as you can get — means he is a Times Echo.  It means he’s a spoiled brat who, since the Big Apple is ahead of the curve with respect to societal degeneration, was raised by liberal parents who probably never laid a hand on his misbehaving, sanctified little posterior.  Understand that leftist Manhattanites are some the most insular, sheltered, provincial people you’ll ever meet.  Sure, they consider themselves sophisticated, as they look down on those in "flyover country," but they tend to know very little about the outside world.  Yes, they travel, but staying in five-star hotels, be they in exotic locales or third-world cities, doesn’t give you a grasp of how the common man lives.  Such an upbringing does, however, instill one with a certain inimitable superciliousness.  Ergo Dean. 

So then Dumbo grew up, became a doctor (really makes you want to stay healthy) and was elected governor of Vermont.  It’s ironic, too, given that the only color other than white found in the Green Mountain state is green.  It has the fewest black people of any state in the nation, but, boy, it sure has a lot of leftists.  One of its problems is that liberal New Yorkers, attracted by Vermont’s pastoral landscape, long ago started moving there.   It seems they didn’t find New York attractive anymore  after the state had been transformed by their own policies.   Anyway, this is why there has been a socialist-inspired secessionist movement in Vermont in recent years.  It seems that our leviathan of a federal government isn’t left-wing enough for them.

Oh, Dean also said in the interview that the Democrat Party comprised only minorities.  What group does Dean belong to?  Rich, overbearing, self-absorbed, obnoxious white men who could double their I.Q. with one serving of fish.

           Protected by Copyright

Posted in , , , ,

7 responses to “Howard Dean: Republicans the “White Party””

  1. democrat Avatar
    democrat

    His wording may have been a little off, but his message is dead on. Not only is it the “white party,” but it’s also the “rich party,” even though not all of those who are rich agree with their politics. It has been a historic fact that over time, the party of Abraham Lincoln has changed, and that their main base is now wealthy, usually from old money, white men who have relatively little compassion for others, especially if the others aren’t in their circle, or someone in Washington who holds the authority to grant tax cuts for big businesses. And those who are not wealthy but are republicans are usually racist, bigoted freaks who are losers in their own rights and have to point the finger at others, i.e. Selwyn Duke.

    Like

    Reply
  2. W. Tieff Avatar
    W. Tieff

    ‘Tis better to be a racist, bigoted freak than a godless, heathen Pink!! hahah.. lol

    Like

    Reply
  3. democrat Avatar
    democrat

    W. Tieff, as I told you before, I’m not interested. And don’t you have something else to talk about other than gay issues. You sound like Rosie O’Donnell. And not to mention, it is a bit tiring, old, and especially immature. But then again, I’ve grown to expect the endless diversion tactics of you repiglicans.

    Like

    Reply
  4. W. Tieff Avatar
    W. Tieff

    What gay issues? I just thought it was a funny rhyme… was it the “Pink” in there that made you ASSume something? You, of all people, should know better! I of course meant “Pink” as in, “Pinko-commie Communist”……..
    And BTW, everyone knows that the Dumbocrats are masters of diversion tactics. For example, as you have only a reactionary understanding of the Republican Party, you cannot help but throw insensitive epithets such as “racist”, and “bigot” at hard-working rural Americans who have limited capital. You rage against the influence peddlers who attempt to control the pools of wealth, and then you call for equitable “distribution” of said wealth, but I’ve got a hunch you wouldn’t care too greatly to “distribute” that wealth to those so-called racist bigots, now would you? No matter how poor they may be……….
    Republican and Independent and Democrat and Libertarian all, as long as they keep Faith in their hearts and the Hope for the American Dream, will by default wish that same Faith and Hope upon every other damn American Citizen, and even those wishing to become Citizens (legally, of course). Now is that not “compassionate” enough for you? Would you rather our efforts be adjusted toward shoveling welfare programs and midnight basketball at the huddled masses? Or would it be okay to keep raising our families and building businesses that offer jobs and careers and that won’t be taxed into Submission by big Government? Because if a traditional Family or a youthful, enterprising go-getter can make a million or more in this free Republic, then everyone can. Maybe not all at the same time, mind you. But just take Oprah Winfrey, for example. She wasn’t always a multi-billionaire. But she is now. Would you have called her a “freak” before she was rich, or after?
    Feh!

    Like

    Reply
  5. democrat Avatar
    democrat

    The biggest diversionary tactic is the one where we began looking for Osama bin Laden but somehow miraculously ended up assassinating Sadaam Hussein. This tactic caused many innocent lives to be taken and not to mention, our economy being flushed down the toilet. And mind you, this was a Bush/Chaney/Rove concoction, and last we all checked, they were members of your party.
    Now, Oprah isn’t the only billionaire you can think of I’m sure, so why bring her up because she is neither a Republican nor has she created an diversionary tactics, and most importantly, she hasn’t advocated any socialist policies throughout her career. She happens to be one of the most giving of the wealthy, much like Bill Gates and his wife. I believe that what they are doing has much more meaning than just donating to a college or university to have your name displayed on a building, like so many others.
    And for the bigots that want to vote republican because they think that they will inadvertenly hold a minority back, let David Duke take care of them. Oh, I forgot, his well isn’t that deep, nor does he really give a damn about his supporters.

    Like

    Reply
  6. W. Tieff Avatar
    W. Tieff

    Funny you should mention that terrible Iraq adventure, and David Duke in the same post, Democrat.
    This just in: http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/08/guess_who_said_it.html

    Like

    Reply
  7. Linda Avatar
    Linda

    THIS IS RACIAL BULLSHIT. YOU ARE DUMB. THERE IS NOTHING GOOD BUT GOD. SO YOUR TALK OF UNIFICATION OF A RACE IS STUPID HATRED. MAY YOU FEEL THE WRATH OF GOD WHEN YOU TAKE YOUR LAST BREATH.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a reply to W. Tieff Cancel reply