6 responses to “California’s High Court Upholds Proposition 8”

1. 

   Philip France

   May 31, 2009

   Dear Selwyn:
   How right you are to compare the proponents of faux marriage to children. Like children, they do not percieve the over-arching and long-term ramifications of the methods by which they seek to “get their way” (i.e. judicial activism and corrupt judges).
   Such proponents are infantile in their insistance on “fairness”, a term that should have been purged from our vocabularies by the third grade. One can only legislate “fairness” by the gun or the sword. There is a reason that you and I cannot hit a golf ball like Tiger Woods does. Or sing the way Luciano Pavorotti did. Or run a corporation the way that Mitt Romney did. And, to be “fair” even to a psychopathic lunatic, act like Sean Penn does (Cinematically speaking).
   Homosexuals have chosen a lifestyle in which they should be much more marginalized than they presently are. They have chosen a lifestyle that defies their most Darwinian instincts of survival and the promulgation of their species. How sad that the millenia of micro-evolution that led to the manifold talents and intelligence of modern homosexuals will end with their deviant lifestyle choice.
   Sadder still is the ignorance of history in that when this sort of moral depravity prevails to rule a society, those who espouse it are the first to suffer. I cite Ernst Rohm and the Brown Shirts (SA) of the fledging Nazis. Rohm was a violent and radical homosexual who, with other “butch” homosexuals violently intimidated Jews and secular and Christian Germans (including effeminate homosexuals) during Hitler’s rise to power. Once Der Furher got what we wanted, he liquidated Rohm and his Brown Shirts in the Night of the Long Knives, accurately predicting that their form of activism would threaten his political might.
   Furthermore, Hitler arrived at his megalomaniac death culture through the courts. Every hideous crime that he commited against humanity was previously made legal by activist judges in German courts.
   Those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it. Homosexuals and their fellow-travelers who seek faux marriage should back off and appreciate their present-day societal gains, which greatly exceed what should be condoned by a civil and morally-ordered society.

   LikeLike

   Reply
2. 

   Philip France

   May 31, 2009

   I wish to add a further point:
   Faux marriage has been “legalized” in a number of ststes. As Selwyn pointed out, this is not so much a “redefining” of an institution, but the dangerous “undefining” of one.
   One of the great tactical lies of the liberal/progressive Left is to call something that which it is not. Even the term “liberal” contradicts the outright fascism of its most vocal activists.
   By law, homosexuals in these states can “legally” state that they are married and show state-sanctioned proof that they are. This does not change the fact that, by definition, they cannot be nor will they ever be. Marriage has its basis in the Word and Will of God Almighty, who abundantly warns us of the dangers of such proclivity. This has been clearly understood for millenia by both religious and secular humanity. This caution is being defied by a small percentage of infantile activists whose minds have been distorted by a lifetime of believing lies. One can take a jar of pickles and place on it a label that says “Apples”. This in no way changes the pickles that are on the inside.
   Illegitimi non coverundum.

   LikeLike

   Reply
3. 

   polysci

   June 3, 2009

   Marriage is a state issue, not a federal one. So if some states wish to have gay marriage while others do not, who is anyone else to tell them that they’re right or wrong, especially if you don’t live in that state. Furthermore, here in America, the popular votes win. So if people have voted on the issue and they chose to have gay marriage, then that’s their choice. But to be quite honest, no one’s marriage or non-marriage affects anyone elses, so I believe people should just mind their businesses and worry about their own homes.

   LikeLike

   Reply
4. 

   Philip France

   June 3, 2009

   Dear polysci(ience fiction),
   You are wrong again. You say that “popular votes win”. That would mean that we are a Democracy. We are not. We are a Republic. Democracy is majority rule. Were this the case (that we are a simple Democracy), the United States would still have prayer in school, abortion would be criminalized, our borders would be closed and English would be our official language. Conversely, we might also still have slavery in some states (although I doubt it, it WOULD be possible).
   No, my immature friend, we are a Republic. This means that we (should) adhere to the rule of law (i.e. our Constitution). You are correct in advocating state rights and faux marriage within individual states should be accepted or rejected under each state’s respective constitution, but faux marriage has thus far been imposed by judicial fiat or by declaration of legislators in violation of the respective state’s constitution and legislative process.
   Most importantly, you miss Selwyn’s point (and my point): This is FAUX marriage. If homosexuals want their phony unions, come up with your own description. Don’t insult thousands of years of human micro-evolution and the sensibilities of the overwhelming majority of humankind by calling and labelling such unions something that which it is not and never can be. Then, and only then might we be able and willing to “mind our own business” and “worry about our own homes”.
   You have a great deal of growing up to do, my friend. I offer my hand in friendship to provide such help.

   LikeLike

   Reply
5. 

   Shaun

   June 4, 2009

   Phillip,
   I have been following your comments for several months now and I would like to thank you for the complimentary insight and defense of Selwyn’s ideas. As always, whenever I read your responses to critics I always receive a small sense of satisfication that brightens my day. Thanks friend!
   Shaun
   UCA

   LikeLike

   Reply
6. 

   Philip France

   June 4, 2009

   May God bless you Shaun for your kind sentiments. It is reassuring to know of like-minded friends who seek logic, justice and the Truth.
   Yours truly, and from sea to shining sea,
   Philip

   LikeLike

   Reply