Baby in Womb By Selwyn Duke

It's hard to imagine anything more evil: a woman kills a friend so
that she can steal her unborn baby by ripping it from her womb.

But it has happened before in recent years, and now it has happened
again in Worcester, Massachusetts. Boston.com reports on the crime, writing,

Julie Corey, 35, had lived with her
parents for several months over the last year before returning to
Worcester and telling acquaintances she was pregnant.

Police believe that Corey never gave
birth, that she may have faked her pregnancy, and that the newborn girl
she was showing off last weekend was really the daughter of Darlene
Haynes, a 23-year-old mother of three who had been eight months
pregnant before she was found dead in her Worcester home on Monday
[7/27], her child ripped from her womb.

Read the rest here.

Posted in , , , ,

5 responses to “Woman Murdered, Baby Cut from Womb”

  1. Philip France Avatar
    Philip France

    Dear Selwyn,
    You have an intellectual twin with a fellow guest commentator on The Savage Nation.
    I am referring to Professor Ellis Washington and I would like to recommend to you and your visitors and admirers his book, “The Nuremberg Trials: Last Tragedy of The Holocaust”.
    I will precaution that this book was poorly edited and barely proof-read, but the sentiments; sound logic and the unbridled passion of the author for truth and Godly justice are unmistakable. It is a riveting book that I highly recommend.

    Like

  2. Shaun Avatar

    Philip,
    What is this book about? It seems to have caught my interest but I couldn’t find any reviews on amazon. It was 30 bucks and being that I am in college I’m not always flush with cash. I want to make sure its pretty good before I spend the money.
    Thanks,
    Shaun Griswold

    Like

  3. Philip France Avatar
    Philip France

    Dear Shaun,
    This book is not merely about the Nuremberg Trials. This event occured correspondently with the formation of the criminally corrupt United Nations.
    If I might be so bold to speak on behalf of the esteemed Professor Washington, the over-arching point is the decision by the Nuremberg (as well as the Tokyo) tribunal to remove morality from the trial jurisprudence in favor of secular materialsim and human “logic” ia a travesty of justice to the million of Jews and other groups (Gypsies, Christians, homosexuals, the disabled, mentally retarded and deformed) that suffered at the hands of the most egregious and heinous crimes of humanity.
    Professor Washington presents his points with firm eloquence and supplies the reader with abundant historical anecdotes, quotations and perspectives (all painstainkingly footnoted and referenced in his appendix).
    The most poignant observation to me personally was that Professor Washington named four individuals that are most responsible for America’s lurch away from our Constitution and toward the moral desert of secularism and the reprehensible separation of natural and moral law from jurisprudence.
    The four? (If you read on, I urge you to buy the book for the explanation, which is made quite plain and is most compelling).
    Karl Marx
    Charles Darwin
    Sigmund Freud
    Oliver Wendell Holmes
    Shaun, if this book is not in your student library, demand it! If this fails, notify me here and I will send you my copy.

    Like

  4. Philip France Avatar
    Philip France

    Shaun,
    I saw your post at The New American article. Your pst was great.
    What is disturbing is that I made a post last evening that was white-washed from the blog.
    My comments challenged poster “Greg” on his declaration of atheism. I then postulated a hypothetical challenge to “Greg” to make an oak tree. My points were evidently too poignant for public consumption. My post was presnt late last evening but is now gone. I can now empathize with Dr. Michael Savage, wheras before I could merely sympathize.
    Some of the comments of others refer to to my post, but once again I have been silenced. Worse yet, my Constitutionally-protected free speech has been unlawfully abridged.

    Like

  5. Shaun Avatar

    Philip,
    In regards to your post I believe that the ratings system that site uses ( + or – ) has an effect on the comments longetivity. So if your comment gets so many negative remarks it is removed…I know this because my comment is gone too. This doesn’t suprise me. What does suprise me is that people will dance around the issue of morality forever while searching for the missing part of the equation. No professor, no peer, or website commenter can explain why (pick your sin) is wrong. It is impossible to make judgments without a source of absolute Law. Seems like an eternal limbo of mental gymnastics to me.
    Shaun

    Like

Leave a reply to Shaun Cancel reply