Angel vs. DemonBy Selwyn Duke

In writing this piece, I’m reminded of a little exchange between the late William F. Buckley and friend and fellow National Review writer Florence King. Buckley had just penned some less-than-flattering words about a recently deceased person of prominence whose name escapes me, and King chided him, saying something to the effect that he had broken ground in journalism: the “attack-obit.” Buckley’s response was, “Wait till you see the obituary I have planned for you!”

And in writing this critical article about bon vivant Christopher Hitchens in the wake of his death this past Thursday, I expect some ridicule as well. Yet I don’t think Hitchens would demand to be spared the acidic ink he used to eviscerate others — or that he would have any credibility doing so. Remember that this was the man who, before the gentle Jerry Falwell’s body was even cold, said things such as “If he [Falwell] had been given an enema, he could have been buried in a matchbox” and “I wish there was a Hell for Falwell.”

For my part, I wouldn’t wish eternal damnation on Hitchens; I truly hope he rests in peace. But I can’t say the same for his legacy. And when I see the obligatory exaltation of his life’s work — with secular icons, the deader they get, the better they were — I think that legacy needs a little damnation.

Read the rest here.

Posted in , , , ,

4 responses to “Christopher Hitchens: Godlessness Is Not Great — How Atheism Poisons Everything”

  1. Robert Berger Avatar
    Robert Berger

    At least Hitchens wasn’t a rabid homophobe who spread lies and hatred of gay people ,
    or an anti-abortion fanatic who murdered doctors and bombed women’s health clinics,
    didn’t want to see gay people executed or have people executed for “blasphemy”,
    didn’t want to make non-christians second-class citizens or want to turn any country into a Christian or Muslim theocracy, among other things.
    All these evils are the result of religious fanaticism .And of course, he never flew an airplane into a tall building or advocated stoning women to death for adultery, or executing doctors who performed abortions .
    The claim that atheism is responsible for the millions of people murdered by such monsters as Stalin,Mao Zedong,and Pol Pot is disingenuous . They were not evil monsters because they were atheists , but because they were evil to the core in the first place .
    The overwhelming majority of atheists are nothing like this ,including Hitchens. He may very well have been a far more decent and honorable man than many who claim to be religious .

    Like

  2. yoyo Avatar
    yoyo

    as long time critic of hitchens as well as a fellow atheist it is the nastiest and saddest argument that hitchens was athiest because he needed to hide his “sins”. He was an atheist and a special atheist because he was clear and strong about the lack of evidence for a christian goddett and because his arguments about Christian “godliness” were so clear. Mother Theresa WAS a monster, she took money from Baby Doc in haiti, she prefered suffering to healing. Unfortunately he supported the war in Iraq, we are all flawed beasts but as an intellectual giant I would take him against a fearful apologist any day!

    Like

  3. Patrick Avatar
    Patrick

    “…gentle Jerry Falwell…”
    Yeah, I stopped reading there.

    Like

  4. gray man Avatar
    gray man

    “The claim that atheism is responsible for the millions of people murdered by such monsters as Stalin,Mao Zedong,and Pol Pot is disingenuous . They were not evil monsters because they were atheists , but because they were evil to the core in the first place .”
    nonsense.
    they were evil because of they were atheists.

    Like

Leave a reply to Patrick Cancel reply