By Selwyn Duke
Young, handsome and Hispanic, Marco Rubio was once hailed as
one of the new faces of the Republican Party. But now we learn that he actually
brings two new faces to the GOP.
One that says one thing one moment and another that says a
different thing at a different moment.
After all, while Rubio appeared in this deceptive ad touting
the supposed conservative nature of his amnesty bill, The Examiner tells
us the following:
In a Spanish-language interview
Sunday with the network Univision, Sen. Marco Rubio, the leading Republican on
the Gang of Eight comprehensive immigration reform group, made his strongest
statement yet that legalization of the nation’s estimated 11 million illegal
immigrants must happen before any new border security or internal enforcement
measures are in place, and will in no way be conditional on any security
requirements.
“Let’s be clear,” Rubio said.
“Nobody is talking about preventing the legalization. The legalization is going
to happen. That means the following will happen: First comes the legalization.
Then come the measures to secure the border. And then comes the process of
permanent residence.”
And then comes the death of the nation.
The Gang of Eight (GOE) scamnesty bill would grant
legalization to more than 30
million migrants — and the number could be far higher — over the next 10
years, who will then have further access to taxpayer-funded services, programs
and handouts. Moreover, demographic
electoral analysis clearly shows that virtually all these new “Americans”
would vote for socialist politicians (read: liberal Democrats), just as they
did in their native lands. So I understand why GOE-Scam authors Dick Durbin
(D-IL), Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Robert Menendez (D-NJ) consider the bill a
good idea. I understand why Mexico considers it a good idea. I understand why
China, Russia and any other nation that wanted American power and culture
neutralized would consider it a good idea. But why, Senator Rubio, do you
consider the bill a good idea? You and your politics keep some very strange and
alarming bedfellows.
So I have something to say, and this isn’t just for Rubio. Any
politician — Democrat, Republican or independent — who supports amnesty in any
form or by any name is dead to me.
Dead.
Immigration is a deal-breaker issue because it involves
forces with the power to reshape your land into a different nation altogether.
Thus, I would say that there can be no compromise on it, except that compromise
isn’t even on the horizon. That is to say, imagine the powers-that-be didn’t
have the will to punish the current crop of apprehended bank robbers; instead,
they wanted to grant them amnesty and let them keep their ill-gotten gains. But
they promised that if we agreed to this plan, they would increase police
presence and reinforce bank-vault doors in the future. Would you consider this
compromise? Would it even be that if we granted amnesty to only 20 percent of
bank robbers?
Agreeing to facilitate law-breaking isn’t compromise — it’s
capitulation. In a sane world, you don’t allow criminals to reap the benefits
of their law-breaking; you punish them. Compromise would be if we were
discussing ending all immigration — as we should
do — but then agreed to settle for a mere reduction in the numbers.
But it appears that some so-called “conservatives” have
taken a high-dose stupid pill. The best predictor of future behavior is past
behavior. Ronald Reagan got bitten by his 1986 amnesty (which he called a
“mistake”) when he agree to legalize the law-breakers in return for a Democrat
promise of border enforcement, a promise that wasn’t worth the paper it was
printed on. And since then we’ve had six more amnesties.
Fact: the Democrats have never secured the border.
And they never will.
Oh, if the new arrivals had a history of voting GOP, the
border would be locked down so tight a bacterium couldn’t breach it. There’d be
a wall with a fence on top of it, military patrols and Star Wars-type drones
with heat-seeking technology buzzing about. But the Democrats have no intention
of rejecting their main constituency: anyone who isn’t Americanized.
And that’s the point. Allowing immigration doesn’t just
invite new people into your nation — it invites new voters into your nation. And
any Republican who believes that the Hispanic voting bloc can be wooed with
Rubioesque pandering is far too ignorant and dangerous to hold office.
If Marco Rubio and his fellow travelers want to hasten the
death of traditional America, they are dead to me. Let’s ensure that their
political careers rest in peace long before the republic does.
Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Twitter or log on to SelwynDuke.com
© 2013 Selwyn Duke — All Rights Reserved
selwynduke.com 
Leave a reply to Selwyn Duke Cancel reply