By Selwyn Duke
“It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are 20 gods, or no
god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” This thought,
articulated by Thomas Jefferson 200 years ago, aligns well with
sentiments espoused today. “I don’t care what adults do in their private
lives,” says the libertarian. “But listen, buddy,” adds the
don’t-tread-on-me conservative, “just don’t shove it in my face.” But
does this characteristic attitude of American modernity damn us to spawn
a very un-American posterity? Does a misguided tolerance ensure an
intolerable future?
Continual tolerance of a thing generally
leads to its acceptance. For instance, while we may find ice-age
temperatures unpleasant, a civilization experiencing them long enough
becomes like the Eskimos in the Arctic and accepts its eternal winter as
the new normal. But what of the abnormal? Should it be tolerated?
To
answer this question, we must first address moderns’ flawed conception
of tolerance. G.K. Chesterton once said, “Tolerance is the virtue of the
man without convictions”; it should be added that it is also his vice.
For tolerance is a virtue only when exercised as is necessary, since it
implies a perceived negative. For example, you would have to tolerate an
itchy rash or stubborn cold, but you wouldn’t tolerate a fine car or a
delectable meal — you relish those things. And while we may admire a man
who tolerates suffering with a stiff upper lip, this may turn to
contempt if he invites it upon himself with a tolerance for being a
doormat; it then seems like weakness of character at best, masochism at
worst.
Read the rest here.
selwynduke.com 
Leave a reply to Smakius Cancel reply