With possibly 99 percent of the political violence originating with the “Left,” some are asking a question. To wit:
Is violent left-wing rhetoric responsible for yet another criminal incident, this time the recent Catholic Mass shooting?

With possibly 99 percent of the political violence originating with the “Left,” some are asking a question. To wit:
Is violent left-wing rhetoric responsible for yet another criminal incident, this time the recent Catholic Mass shooting?
Why is the GOP House majority so slim, despite the Democrats’ profound unpopularity? One reason is the same reason the Democrats can’t win the current gerrymandering war:
They’ve already expended their ammo.
(They also don’t control enough states.)
If you’d ask who originated gerrymandering, the Democrats or Republicans, know that the strategy is almost as old as the Republic itself. But also know it was named after Founding Father Elbridge Gerry, who facilitated it for the Democratic-Republicans in 1812. (The victims back then were the Federalists.) Today, though, the Democrats certainly have mastered the technique. This is why, for example, they hold 14 of Illinois’ 17 congressional seats — despite their winning just 55-60 percent of the statewide vote.
And now the Republicans are threatening to follow suit. In fact, should they choose the gerrymandering nuclear option, they could gain as many as 11 to 15 congressional seats. That’s just for starters, too.
“I’ve come to the conclusion that we’ve been sold a bill of goods.”
“And the bill of goods was called multiculturalism.”
So said liberal evolutionary biologist, researcher, ex-academic, and now podcaster and commentator Brett Weinstein. He made his comments recently during a very intellectual discussion with famed clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson, part of which was posted Friday to the latter’s YouTube channel. And the two men essentially issued a warning, albeit in the most highbrow tone. To wit:
Multiculturalism threatens Western civilization itself by prioritizing differences (read: diversity) over unity. If it is not “canceled,” the West very well may be.
Image created using Grok AI.
By Selwyn Duke
Some things never change, not even the nature of the ever-changing. The mythological Norse god Loki, a malevolent shapeshifter, changed form to outwit those who’d begun to recognize his previous guises. As for the real world and today, are we witnessing this age-old strategy being repeated?
At issue is the notion that, with President Donald Trump’s election and a Sydney Sweeney-esque advertising revolution, “wokeness” is waning. This sentiment is widespread, too, reflected in recent books such as British satirist Andrew Doyle’s The End of Woke and Piers Morgan’s Woke Is Dead.
Well, yes, that’s what wokeness, if I may anthropomorphize it, wants you to think.
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child,” wrote late journalist P.J. O’Rourke in 1992. This creature is, he continued, “miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.” One could now think, “My, I wish O’Rourke would’ve stopped mincing words and told us how he really felt.” But, today, a generation later, many are posing the question he was attempting to answer.
For example, a Monday article headline asks, “Why Are Academics [generally hard-left] — and Others — So Nasty?” The author, Christopher Chantrill, wonders why leftists are so dogmatic and censorial. Another article headline, appearing the day before, queried, “Are they crazy? Or are they just leftist? With some women, it’s hard to tell.”
The latter focuses on that not-sideshow-worthy human oddity now called a “Karen.” This is, of course, a person, typically a middle-aged white woman, who’s entitled, demanding, and usually woke.