By Selwyn Duke

When Joe Biden’s earpiece expresses, through his mouth, its firm intention to nominate a black female Supreme Court candidate, critics will say that race and sex shouldn’t matter in such things. Well, don’t worry — they won’t.

Whoever Justice X ends up being, she’ll almost assuredly vote in lockstep with white Elena Kagan and Hispanic Sonya Sotomayor. She’ll almost definitely vote just the way white ACLU baby Ruth Bader Ginsburg did. This just underlines, too, how superficially made any “diversity” choice would be.

Biden’s earpiece’s SCOTUS pick could be a white man. He could be Asian-descent. The nominee could be purple with pink polka dots, a “transgender” primordial dwarf, an acromegaly sufferer with a watermelon-size head or an extraterrestrial who looks like Alf. It wouldn’t matter. He, she, ze or it would vote as today’s Democrat picks generally do: as a rubber stamp for the leftist agenda.

(more…)

By Selwyn Duke

I was on the second hour of the show. My appearance begins at 52:20.

Note: To fast-forward to my segment, you must right-click on the in-line MP3 player below and then click "Open link in new tab."

Talkback-01-28-2022

By Selwyn Duke

It was in 2013 that an astrobiologist named Jack O’Malley-James warned that life on Earth would eventually end due to a depletion of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Now we’re hearing, also contrary to global warming hand-wringing about excess amounts of the gas posing a danger, that we may one day purposely pump it into our atmosphere as a life-preserving measure.

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

Joe Biden has vowed to discriminate based on race and sex when choosing the next Supreme Court justice. If you complain about that and happen to be a white man, however, it’s because you just “can’t wait to get mad about a black woman” on the SCOTUS. So says Daily Beast writer Kali Holloway who, echoing many on the Left, has made that on-a-dime turn from equality to “equity” and proposes that if you bemoan prejudice, you just must be prejudiced.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

Thousands dead due to secondary effects of lockdowns, children’s development stunted and youth mental-health problems increasing, livelihoods ruined, depression and suicide up, the economy wobbly, and freedoms destroyed — all with no apparent reduction in coronavirus spread. This is the all-cons-and-no-pros result of COVID policy.

It’s also something else: “a catastrophic moral crime.”

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has been slammed for invoking WWII-era, Nazi atrocities while speaking at Sunday’s rally against COVID-19 mandates. But while mainstream media have labeled his remarks “anti-Semitic,” in reality, a very interesting group preceded him in associating forced mass vaccination with the Holocaust: Holocaust survivors themselves.

Kennedy’s comments came in the midst of a longer speech at the “Defeat the Mandates” rally at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., as he was warning about how technology threatened to make totalitarianism truly total.

“What we’re seeing today is what I call turnkey totalitarianism,” he said, introducing the topic. “They are putting in place all of these technological mechanisms for control we’ve never seen before.”

“It’s been the ambition of every totalitarian state since the beginning of mankind to control every aspect of behavior, of conduct, of thought and to obliterate dissent,” he continued. “None of them have been able to do it. They didn’t have the technological capacity.”

But then came the remarks that truly raised mainstream media ire.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

A German study a while back found that not even one healthy child died of COVID, and Britain just recently dropped its “vaccine” passport requirement along with other coronavirus restrictions. But even though the establishment “pandemic” narrative is beginning to crack around him, Dr. Anthony Fauci apparently plans to die with his “Do the same thing but expect a different result” boots on.

In fact, despite studies showing that “vaccinating” children against the China virus would kill more kids than it would save, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) head is still dead set on jabbing the little ones — this time children under five.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

As most know, there’s a contentious debate over whether it’s fair to let men who claim they’re female compete in women’s sports. It’s a debate driven more by emotion than reason, as so many things are.

If a fellow claiming female status trounces woman athletes in a fairly high profile competition — as University of Pennsylvania swimmer “Lia” Thomas (birth name “Will”) did recently — the story makes headlines and raises ire; if such a man falters, as Thomas did quite suspiciously and conveniently even more recently, the story disappears. And each side in the debate often claims vindication based on the most recent result. Yet there is a way to definitively and irrefutably (within the realm of reason) prove that one side is correct.

(more…)

By Selwyn Duke

When Florida Governor Ron DeSantis echoed other conservatives and warned last November that “vaccinated” Americans without boosters could be declared unvaccinated and lose their jobs, the Independent “fact-checked” the statement and claimed he was “lying.” “The director of the CDC says the Biden administration has no plans to reclassify vaccinated people as unvaccinated if they don’t get boosters,” the paper wrote in its subhead.

Yet now it appears that the very same director of the CDC, the very same woman who made that promise, is doing just that.

Except, said Rochelle Walensky, “[W]e’re pivoting our language”: “Vaccinated” will be reclassified as “up to date.”

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

Men have long been confused about women, but this always related to the latter’s personalities. “Transgender” activists have taken this to a new level, however, claiming they can’t even define what a woman is (hence the feminist complaint that they’re “erasing women”).

A good example occurred on a recent Dr. Phil episode that featured Daily Wire podcast host Matt Walsh debating MUSS (Made-up Sexual Status, a.k.a. “transgender”) activists. Walsh asked two of the individuals one of his typical questions, “What is a woman?” and they readily admitted they had no answer. They were firm on something else, though:

That Walsh’s push-back caused them “anxiety,” “depression,” and “nightmares,” as one of them later wrote on social media.

Read the rest here.