By Selwyn Duke

Unlike Las Vegas, what happens in college doesn’t stay in college. In fact, contrary to the assurances of those once saying that “woke” students would change when hitting the “real world,” it has long been apparent that they actually change that world and make it more unreal. This is why, says one journalist, it’s terrifying that academia is now inuring students to full-bore COVID Ritual — and that many young people support the unscientific restrictions.  

In his article, Michael Tracey makes a couple of rarely heard points relating to why not just COVID, but COVID Ritual, may be here to stay. For starters and aside from more nefarious reasons to perpetuate coronavirus restrictions, changing course would require a “paradigm shift” in thinking on the disease. Second, the tremendous China virus “infrastructure” — a lot of money is being made off SARS-CoV-2 scientific obscurantism — won’t be dismantled anytime soon.

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

I was on the second hour of the show. My appearance begins at 52:20.

Note: To fast-forward to my segment, you must right-click on the in-line MP3 player below and then click "Open link in new tab."

Talkback-09-24-2021

By Selwyn Duke

“We like to think that we’re quite close to the ancient world, that they were really just like us,” said Oxford ancient history lecturer Josephine Quinn in 2014, talking about Carthaginian infant sacrifice. The “truth is,” she continued, “that they really weren’t.” 

While true that even some contemporary cultures (e.g., the Taliban) are alien to us, never mind B.C.-era, North African pagans, we may have a bit more in common with the Carthaginians than the academic thinks. Those ancients, after all, sacrificed babies because they wanted better lives. The common explanation for their bloody habit, said Quinn, was “that the gods ‘heard my voice and blessed me.’” Today’s infant sacrifice is likewise driven by a desire for “better lives,” though the god worshiped isn’t Ba’al Hammon but materialism, hedonism, and “self-ism.”

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

The federal government’s violation of its border commitments “does in fact empower any border state to control their own sovereign territory.” So said Stephen Miller, ex-senior advisor to President Donald Trump, on Tuesday’s edition of Tucker Carlson Tonight.

Miller was, of course, referencing the southern-border invasion being wink-and-nod facilitated by the Biden administration and was saying, in no uncertain terms, that the states need to do the job the feds won’t do.

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

“Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die,” wrote poet Alfred, Lord Tennyson in 1854. While the line implies that military men must do their duty and obey superiors regardless of cost, we know there are such things as illegal orders. There are also irrational, suicidal orders, such as the event inspiring Tennyson’s line: the disastrous charge of a Light Brigade during the Crimean War’s Battle of Balaclava. Yet while that tragedy resulted from innocent blunders, many wouldn’t say the same about another irrational order: the Biden administration’s directive that all American servicemen be “vaccinated” against SARS-CoV-2 despite soldiers being at greater risk of dying of suicide than COVID-19.

And now the administration wants the Pentagon to be able to court-martial any serviceman who resists.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

“First, do no harm…” — to the state’s official ideology. This seems to be the message with, according to a report, people increasingly labeled “mentally ill” and being compelled to see psychiatrists for opposing irrational COVID-19 mask mandates. In fact, one law student was reportedly likened to a mass shooter, threatened with permanent legal-profession exclusion, and was told by a school dean, “We don’t know if you’re psychologically capable of following the rules.”

Welcome to what has been called the “weaponization of psychiatry.” The Soviet Union was infamous for it (there just must be something wrong with you if you oppose enlightened state ideology, after all), and, chillingly, it’s now emerging in the United States.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

What do you call it when half the population doesn’t feel free to protest at their own nation’s Capitol?

Some call it the situation we’re now in — and they say that the recent “Justice for J6” (January 6 prisoners) rally is Exhibit A.

The September 18 event was always a no-win situation for conservatives, as President Trump explained in a Federalist interview last week. “‘On Saturday, that’s a setup,’ Trump said, referring to the rally,” the site relates. “‘If people don’t show up they’ll say, ‘Oh, it’s a lack of spirit.’ And if people do show up they’ll be harassed.’”

This common-sense prediction was vindicated because after only about 400 to 450 genuine protesters attended the rally, Congressman Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) tweeted, “The very small crowd size at the #JusticeforJ6 traitorous rally shows the waning influence of the former President.”

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

“I had a heart attack….”

A bit more than a month ago I wrote about “My troubling COVID vaccine story experiences.” Aside from citing a friend who developed heart inflammation after taking a coronavirus genetic-therapy agent (GTA, a.k.a. a “vaccine”; more on this later), I mentioned that I’d had some unusual experiences: I encountered two men within a relatively short period of time, at the same recreational facility, who told me they’d had heart attacks — after taking SARS-CoV-2 GTAs.

One man suspected the GTA induced his coronary; the other fellow was oblivious, though his attack occurred the month after his shot.

(more…)

By Selwyn Duke

Since anyone who knows geography better than AOC understands that 15,000 Haitians didn’t walk from Hispaniola to the Mexican border, a question arises:

How did the current Haitian wave of illegals end up massing in Del Rio, Texas?

An immigration researcher learned the answer in a very simple way — by asking the migrants themselves.

And here’s the short answer: the Biden administration.

Now for the details.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

The “science,” which we’re supposed to “follow,” informs that perhaps 85 percent of COVID-19 victims could have been saved if a proper treatment protocol had been officially established. Early intervention is part of this, as it has long been understood that once a coronavirus patient exhibits advanced symptoms and must be hospitalized and ventilated, survivability greatly diminishes.

Enter drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, which have shown promise in mitigating SARS-CoV-2. Then there’s a newer option: the monoclonal antibody therapy REGEN-COV, which the Food and Drug Administration has authorized for use as a “post-exposure prophylaxis (prevention) for COVID-19 in adults and pediatric individuals … who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death,” as the agency puts it. Apparently a game changer, the drug “has been shown to reduce hospitalization rates by 70 percent for high-risk COVID-19 patients treated within 10 days,” as even an article reprinted by liberal Yahoo! News concedes.

Read the rest here.