By Selwyn Duke

Democrat scholar, attorney, and commentator Jonathan Turley (shown) is known as a straight shooter. That’s why it should give even skeptics pause when the George Washington University law professor says that “voting fraud occurred” in the 2020 election and that the process that could prove its magnitude should continue unimpeded.

Critics who’d like to quickly wrap the election up with a bow and present the nation a gift that’ll keep on giving will rhetorically ask, “Where’s the evidence?!” But Turley points out that this question is premature: Obviously, you can’t provide evidence until you conduct an investigation — the very thing those critics would like to forestall.  

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

Imagine it was more than a week after the tax filing deadline, and your accountant still couldn’t tell you how much money your business grossed and netted the previous year. In light of his struggle producing an accurate and trustworthy result, would you be confident that he ever could do so? You might rather assume there was something wrong with the accountant, your system, or both.

More than a week after election day, we still have states counting votes — in history’s most powerful and ostensibly most advanced civilization. In contrast, Ohio delivered its results around midnight on election day, four and a half hours after polls closed.

Is it coincidence, then, that Ohio not only bucked other Rust Belt results by going for Trump, but that it did so by more than eight points?

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

While Democrats are busying measuring White House drapes and making lists of political opponents to persecute, some observers are saying that you shouldn’t count your chickens, well, when they may actually be coming home to roost.   

Even if the vote fraud this election was as massive as appearances indicate, the chances of President Trump flipping enough states to get him the 38 electoral votes required (I’m counting North Carolina and Alaska in his current total) to reach the 270 needed to win may seem remote. After all, vote “fraud on the scale seen this week can hardly be quantified between today and when the Electoral College casts its vote,” as American Thinker’s Jay Valentine points out.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

“The MAGA hat is a KKK hood. And his [Trump’s] evil, racist scourge must be eradicated from society.” So tweeted former CNN host Reza Aslan last August after insisting that “all” the president’s supporters “are by definition white nationalist terror supporters.” Far from a one-off, leftist calls to punish opponents have continued, with statements about how “lists” of Trump supporters be made and how such partisans should “burn.”

Read the rest here. 

Selwyn Duke

“Where’s the evidence?!” ask posturing politicians and pundits regarding 2020-election vote-fraud allegations, though most thus querying don’t really want evidence. But here’s an easy way to get it:

President Trump needs to offer $1 million and full immunity to the first 100 Democrats who come forward with proof of serious vote fraud.

And they’ll sing like a mockingbird during mating season.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

Democrats have lamented how the Electoral College gives smaller states outsized influence over presidential elections. But consider what they’ve done via illegal means: given a handful of Democrat-run, major cities far greater influence over the current election.

That is, with vote-fraud being mainly a Democrat-big-city phenomenon, we now face the prospect that shenanigans in Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, Atlanta and some other leftist metropolises will be the deciding factor in who takes the White House next year.

(more…)

By Selwyn Duke

Does it make sense that a rising red tide should lift all boats in a carrier group except the carrier, whether it’s the USS Donald Trump or not?

This is basically what has happened this election, do note, with Republicans apparently holding the Senate despite having far more seats to defend, gaining ground in the House, and adding a state legislature and one governorship — yet supposedly losing the presidency. As one commentator put it, “This is the first coattail election with no coat.”

It’s especially odd given that many people were concerned about the opposite outcome: new Trump voters, notably among minorities, casting ballots for the president but not otherwise supporting his party.

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

The election talk right now is about how, after authorities suspiciously ceased vote counting in states President Trump seemed poised to win, Michigan and Wisconsin suddenly “flipped” overnight and could give Joe Biden the presidency. But while such shenanigans were long planned and predicted, deeper questions should be pondered: How did America descend to a point where many state and local elections are run as in a Third World banana republic?

Related to this, how did we reach a stage at which a party with a radical, anti-American, anti-life, and anti-science agenda could be so electorally competitive that cheating would matter?

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

As with 2016, the 2020 election year is giving us the unprecedented — in this case, our first non-player character candidate. If this reference escapes you, know that an NPC is technically a gaming character that’s controlled by the computer and responds according to programming (e.g., “C’mon, man!”). As a meme, it refers to a person with no mind or real thoughts of his own.

Enter Joe Biden.

That is, if you’ll even notice. Many conservatives wonder how China Joe could have any chance in the election at all. President Trump’s campaign rallies are enthusiasm-marked events involving often tens of thousands of cheering, engaged patriots who’d follow their man to the ends of the Earth.

(more…)

By Selwyn Duke

“Somewhere between the post office and the Pittsburgh sorting facility something happened.” So said Butler County Elections Director Aaron Sheasley regarding thousands of mail-in ballots requested in his heavily GOP county that were never received.

To be precise, approximately 40,000 mail-in ballots were requested in the Pennsylvania county of 187,853 people and 129,762 registered voters (Sheasley claims the latter number is ~150,000). Yet not only had just 21,300 been returned as of last Thursday, but the county has also gotten more than 10,000 phone calls regarding ballots never received.

Read the rest here.