I was on the second hour of the show. My appearance begins at 52:20, but the whole program is worth hearing.
Note: To fast-forward to my segment, you must right-click on the in-line MP3 player below and then click "Open link in new tab."

I was on the second hour of the show. My appearance begins at 52:20, but the whole program is worth hearing.
Note: To fast-forward to my segment, you must right-click on the in-line MP3 player below and then click "Open link in new tab."
For years conservatives would say that once the fantasy-land-immersed college undergrad snowflakes got out into the “real world,” they’d change. What actually happened was that they changed the “real world,” and the latest example is how our military is transitioning from passé political correctness to the steroid-engorged version called “wokeness.”
Far from their mandate to “kill people and break things,” as radio giant Rush Limbaugh would put it, the military now is breaking standards, meritocracy included.
Read the rest here.
With “equality” passé and the new buzzword being “equity,” racial discrimination is back with a vengeance. The latest example is an academic who wants black Americans’ votes valued at twice those of their white countrymen — as a form of reparations.
Assistant professor Brandon Hasbrouck, who teaches criminal law, race relations law, and critical theory at Washington and Lee University School of Law, is not exactly original. Writing in the Nation last week, his idea closely mirrors a 2015 proposal made by Theodore Johnson, a senior fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice. Johnson, however, was willing to settle for blacks’ votes being worth 5/3rds whites’.
Read the rest here.
Imagine that doing your duty could not only mean losing your career, but also becoming a pariah, getting death threats, having your children harassed, and needing armed protection. This increasingly is the reality for many Americans. In fact, intimidation in the legal system, says an ex-Wisconsin judge, is hampering Republicans’ ability to get election-oriented justice.
In particular, states James Troupis, pressure from the Left is stopping lawyers and judges from accepting and hearing vote-fraud cases.
Read the rest here.
Whether or not coronavirus can be spread asymptomatically is perhaps the most important question surrounding the disease. After all, the assumption that it can has been used to justify mask mandates and life-ravaging lockdowns. This is why it’s striking that a major study, involving almost 10 million people, has found zero cases of asymptomatic transmission — and that our COVID-panic-porn-peddling mainstream media have met it with deafening silence.
Read the rest here.
We may assume that being punished for failing to “be kind to each other and not call each other names” was left behind in fourth grade. But mother of two Kate Scottow found out differently, the hard way, when she was arrested for “making use of a public electronic communications network to cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another.” (Needful anxiety is, presumably, a different matter.)
But the charges against Scottow, a 39-year-old Briton, have now been vacated by England’s High Court.
Read the rest here.
It really is no secret. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did, after all, say during a September United Nations conference that the coronavirus pandemic could be used to advance a “reset” — and he did actually use that word. But while the Canadian leader delighted in the prospect, another prominent figure who spoke of the scheme took a very different view.
In fact, warned top Catholic prelate Cardinal Raymond Burke, the China virus is being used by supporters of “The Great Reset” to promote an “evil agenda.
Read the rest here.
How do chemicals “decide” to become alive? That they can, and did, is essentially the basis for today’s widely accepted origin-of-life theory. But Rice University professor James Tour, a synthetic organic chemist who is widely considered one of America’s leading experts in nanotechnology and nanoengineering, says this theory is not only unproven but untenable. Moreover, he states that in private, many fellow scientists agree with him.
Read the rest here.
It’s amazing how quickly the goalpost-shifting Left transitioned from “equality” to “equity.” For those unacquainted with the latter concept, it’s somewhat reminiscent of the Marxist principle, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” But having been updated and racialized, it’s ostensibly “From each group according to its privileges, to each group according to its oppression,” in the Lexicon of the Left.
A story currently in the news that illustrates equity’s practical application involves a medical “ethicist” discussing the coronavirus vaccine’s rollout. “Harald Schmidt, an expert in ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, said that it is reasonable to put essential workers ahead of older adults, given their risks, and that they are disproportionately minorities,” reported The New York Times.
Read the rest here.
I was on the second hour of the show. My appearance begins at 52:20, but the whole program is worth hearing.
Note: To fast-forward to my segment, you must right-click on the in-line MP3 player below and then click "Open link in new tab."