By Selwyn Duke

Well, they missed the target again — and painted one on their own backs … again. Department store chain Target, infamous for instituting an unpopular “transgender” bathroom policy, again raised ire and eyebrows, this time by banning a book critical of the child abuse euphemistically known as “gender transitioning.” The move was inspired by Made-up Sexual Status (MUSS, or “transgender”) complaints. Demonstrating the market power of the majority, however, the book was reinstated after an impressive backlash on Twitter.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

With the Trump legal team saying it has hundreds of signed affidavits from Americans who’ve witnessed voting fraud or irregularities — some of whom are reportedly afraid for their lives — it’s not surprising that shocking examples of such trespasses are coming to light. And among the more striking ones is an allegation that billionaire Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg was paying election officials who controlled the vote count.

Making the charge is Phill Kline, Liberty University law professor and current director of the Amistad Project, which is a Thomas More Society initiative endeavoring to ensure that our elections are fair and transparent.

Explaining Big Tech’s motives, Kline stated in a One America News interview that the tech giants want to completely control society by determining both information flow and who our leaders will be.

Moreover, calling the November 3 contest “one of the most lawless elections that we have seen in our nation’s history,” Kline makes another shocking allegation: that Detroit Democrats, using as a pretext the claim that military ballots couldn’t be fed into the receiving machines, filled out new ballots for the servicemen without GOP poll watchers present.

By Selwyn Duke

Democrat scholar, attorney, and commentator Jonathan Turley (shown) is known as a straight shooter. That’s why it should give even skeptics pause when the George Washington University law professor says that “voting fraud occurred” in the 2020 election and that the process that could prove its magnitude should continue unimpeded.

Critics who’d like to quickly wrap the election up with a bow and present the nation a gift that’ll keep on giving will rhetorically ask, “Where’s the evidence?!” But Turley points out that this question is premature: Obviously, you can’t provide evidence until you conduct an investigation — the very thing those critics would like to forestall.  

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

Imagine it was more than a week after the tax filing deadline, and your accountant still couldn’t tell you how much money your business grossed and netted the previous year. In light of his struggle producing an accurate and trustworthy result, would you be confident that he ever could do so? You might rather assume there was something wrong with the accountant, your system, or both.

More than a week after election day, we still have states counting votes — in history’s most powerful and ostensibly most advanced civilization. In contrast, Ohio delivered its results around midnight on election day, four and a half hours after polls closed.

Is it coincidence, then, that Ohio not only bucked other Rust Belt results by going for Trump, but that it did so by more than eight points?

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

While Democrats are busying measuring White House drapes and making lists of political opponents to persecute, some observers are saying that you shouldn’t count your chickens, well, when they may actually be coming home to roost.   

Even if the vote fraud this election was as massive as appearances indicate, the chances of President Trump flipping enough states to get him the 38 electoral votes required (I’m counting North Carolina and Alaska in his current total) to reach the 270 needed to win may seem remote. After all, vote “fraud on the scale seen this week can hardly be quantified between today and when the Electoral College casts its vote,” as American Thinker’s Jay Valentine points out.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

“The MAGA hat is a KKK hood. And his [Trump’s] evil, racist scourge must be eradicated from society.” So tweeted former CNN host Reza Aslan last August after insisting that “all” the president’s supporters “are by definition white nationalist terror supporters.” Far from a one-off, leftist calls to punish opponents have continued, with statements about how “lists” of Trump supporters be made and how such partisans should “burn.”

Read the rest here. 

Selwyn Duke

“Where’s the evidence?!” ask posturing politicians and pundits regarding 2020-election vote-fraud allegations, though most thus querying don’t really want evidence. But here’s an easy way to get it:

President Trump needs to offer $1 million and full immunity to the first 100 Democrats who come forward with proof of serious vote fraud.

And they’ll sing like a mockingbird during mating season.

Read the rest here.

By Selwyn Duke

Democrats have lamented how the Electoral College gives smaller states outsized influence over presidential elections. But consider what they’ve done via illegal means: given a handful of Democrat-run, major cities far greater influence over the current election.

That is, with vote-fraud being mainly a Democrat-big-city phenomenon, we now face the prospect that shenanigans in Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, Atlanta and some other leftist metropolises will be the deciding factor in who takes the White House next year.

(more…)

By Selwyn Duke

Does it make sense that a rising red tide should lift all boats in a carrier group except the carrier, whether it’s the USS Donald Trump or not?

This is basically what has happened this election, do note, with Republicans apparently holding the Senate despite having far more seats to defend, gaining ground in the House, and adding a state legislature and one governorship — yet supposedly losing the presidency. As one commentator put it, “This is the first coattail election with no coat.”

It’s especially odd given that many people were concerned about the opposite outcome: new Trump voters, notably among minorities, casting ballots for the president but not otherwise supporting his party.

Read the rest here. 

By Selwyn Duke

The election talk right now is about how, after authorities suspiciously ceased vote counting in states President Trump seemed poised to win, Michigan and Wisconsin suddenly “flipped” overnight and could give Joe Biden the presidency. But while such shenanigans were long planned and predicted, deeper questions should be pondered: How did America descend to a point where many state and local elections are run as in a Third World banana republic?

Related to this, how did we reach a stage at which a party with a radical, anti-American, anti-life, and anti-science agenda could be so electorally competitive that cheating would matter?

Read the rest here.