By Selwyn Duke
Sometimes a reaction can be worse than an action, even when that
action is very, very diabolical. Some would argue that this was the case
with 9/11, with the resultant long-term loss of freedom, misguided
military ventures, and no serious effort whatsoever to seal a porous
back door to America.
The
Boston Marathon bombing also may prove to be a case in which reaction
surpasses action in damage. After all, what good is a doctor’s treatment
if his diagnosis and prescription
are wrong, if he claims that what’s healthy is Hell-sent and portrays
poison as palliative? And what good are our diagnoses and prescriptions
relating to terrorism if we demonize the realists and sanitize the
terrorists? When our physicians will not, or cannot, heal themselves, is
the greater danger posed by those who proudly spread the disease in the
name of one evil cause or those who offer a faux cure in the name of
another?









