• Why Accept Contraception as a Women’s Issue?

    407898_blogBy Selwyn Duke

    While many points have been made about this campaign’s
    contraception controversy, there’s one that I haven’t yet heard anyone mention.

    Why do we accept contraception as a women’s issue?

    (more…)

  • If 51 Percent of the Congress Were Women…

    1991659_blogBy Selwyn Duke

    While watching television Friday evening, I was shocked to see my state’s junior senator, Kirsten Gillibrand, in a campaign ad.
    After all, this is New York and she’s a Democrat, which translates into
    anonymity for her opponent and her enjoyment of about an 87 point lead
    in the polls (okay, I lied; it’s only 43),
    and air time in NY’s market is pricey. Perhaps, I thought, she just
    wanted a tax write-off or vanity compelled her to put her face on TV.
    Then again, maybe she just wanted to see how many elements of propaganda
    could fit into a 30-second political spot.

    It’s not that she opens the ad describing herself as “one of the only
    young mothers serving in the Senate” (Gillibrand is 45 and had her
    first child at 36); hey, she looks good and pulls it off. It’s that her
    little spot, titled “Standing Up for Women,” is, like her, style over
    substance. And what really struck me was her closing line: “Because if
    51 percent of the Congress were women, we wouldn’t be debating
    contraception; we’d be debating jobs and the economy.”

    First, if 100 percent those who governed were women such as her
    opponent, Wendy Long, we wouldn’t be discussing contraception because
    the phony diversionary issue wouldn’t have been manufactured in the
    first place and Uncle Scam wouldn’t be forcing us to pay for others’
    birth control. So let’s be honest, Kirstie, what you really mean to say
    is, “If 51 percent of Congress were women like me.”

    But then there’s something about this contraception matter that, as far as I’ve seen, hasn’t been mentioned.

    Read the rest here.

  • Obama the Classless

    Smoking ObamaBy Selwyn Duke

    When Barack Obama called Mitt Romney a bull******* in a Rolling Stone
    interview recently, it was reminiscent of something involving a man who
    truly fits that description. What I’m referring to has to do with the
    1990s, an intern, and America’s increasingly interned morality.

    After Bill Clinton said that he didn’t consider Monica Lewinsky’s
    services to be sex as he “understood it,” many observers pointed out
    that his lawyering of lasciviousness was influencing the young. “Hey,
    even the president, a Rhodes Scholar, says it isn’t sex!” It’s what you
    call trickle-down decadence. And now what Clinton did for intimate
    relations, Obama is doing for relating.

    A powerful man sets a powerful example, and Obama has always been
    classless. Many complained last year after he invited the rapper
    “Common” to the White House, but forgotten is that Obama admitted in 2004 that he let his daughter Sasha — a tender three years old at the time — listen to rap. If anyone exposed my child to that cultural effluent, the rap he’d get would be in the head.

    Read the rest here.

  • Obama Gets Endorsement of Voting Machine in N.C.

    Snake and AppleBy Selwyn Duke

    It’s the little voting machine that could. In Guilford County, North
    Carolina, some residents who cast ballots for Mitt Romney found their
    votes switched to Barack Obama. Writes MyFox8.com:

    [Bur-Mil Park voter] Sher Coromalis …
    says she cast her ballot for Governor Mitt Romney, but every time she
    entered her vote the machine defaulted to President Obama….

    Marie Haydock, who also voted at the Bur-Mil Park polling location, had the same problem.

    Well, ever since observing Al Gore, I knew that machines leaned
    Democrat. However, a North Carolina elections official posits a
    different theory. Again from MyFox8:

    Guilford County Board of Elections
    Director George Gilbert says the problem arises every election. It can
    be resolved after the machine is re-calibrated by poll workers.

    "It's not a conspiracy [sic] it's just a machine that needs to be corrected," Gilbert said.

    Is it just me, or is this problem that “arises every election” one
    where malfunctioning machines always seem to err in favor of Democrats?

    Other questions are raised. How many people voted for Romney in
    Bur-Mil Park and didn’t even notice their votes were switched? How many
    of Al Gore’s other slightly less charming relatives occupy polling
    stations around America?

    Read the rest here.

  • Barack Obama is a Liar

    Smoking ObamaBy Selwyn Duke

    Calling someone a liar is a serious accusation. This is why,
    aside from the unwritten contract allowing for mutual prevarication,
    politicians are so reluctant to do it. And not just anyone is a liar. Legend
    has it that our first president said, “I cannot tell a lie,” but, being only
    human, G.W. no doubt could and certainly did, at some point. A liar, however, is someone who lives and
    breathes the lie; someone who specializes in the art of artifice; someone to
    whom lying is his first recourse, not his last. Such a man is Barack Obama.

    (more…)

  • Democrat Boss Caught on Video Planning Vote Fraud

    2052845_lowBy Selwyn Duke

    In a shocking display of lawlessness and contempt for our
    electoral system, a Democrat Party operative in Virginia was caught on video facilitating
    a scheme to commit vote fraud. Art Moore of WND.com reports
    on the story
    :

    (more…)

  • Election 2012: Sound Bites vs. Reality

    Pinnochio2By Selwyn Duke

    Any good advertising man knows that a catchy slogan is worth a
    thousand words. A lot more customers are won by “Coke is It!” or “Just
    Do It” than are lost by the tedious expositions on side effects rendered
    at the end of drug commercials. Unfortunately, sound bites, true or
    not, are also effective in politics. They can even trump reality.

    Consider, for instance, the rallying cry “A woman makes only 72 cents
    on a man’s dollar!” This is a  compelling message even though it’s
    wholly deceptive. As I explained here,
    if you dig into the statistics behind that statistic, you learn that
    this disparity is explained not by unjust discrimination but by career
    and lifestyle choices the sexes make, such as entering different
    occupations, working different numbers of hours, and taking on different
    amounts of responsibility. But digging is difficult and people’s
    attention spans are short; thus, even conservative politicians choose to
    mouth platitudes about women’s rights rather than dare explain the
    truth on the wage gap.

    Another sound bite bandied about this election cycle is that Mitt
    Romney pays only 14 percent in tax, a class-warfare message that’s
    supposed to make us believe the rich don’t pony up their “fair share.”
    What this bit of propaganda confuses, however, are income-tax rates with
    the capital-gains tax rate.

    Read the rest here.

  • Study: Women Have Trouble Handling Bad News

    Angry BusinesswomanBy Selwyn Duke

    It seems as if no news really is good news — at least if you’re a
    woman. So says a study out of the University of Montreal (UM), which
    found that women experienced stress after reading negative news stories
    while men did not. Writes William Raillant-Clark in a UM press release:

    The researchers asked 60 people divided
    into four groups to read actual news stories. In order to determine
    their stress levels, the researchers took samples of the participants'
    saliva and analyzed them for a hormone called cortisol. Higher levels of
    this bodily chemical indicate higher levels of stress. A group of men
    and a group of women read "neutral" news stories, about subjects such as
    the opening of a new park or the premiere of a new film, while the
    [other] two gender segregated groups read negative stories, about events
    such as murders or accidents.

    CBS News reports on the findings, writing:

    The day after the experiments, the subjects were called in and asked about what they had read.

    While reading the stories alone did not
    increase stress levels, the researchers found that women who read
    negative news had higher stress levels after memory and intellect
    experiments compared to the women who read the neutral news.

    "Moreover, the women were able to
    remember more of the details of the negative stories," [lead author and
    Ph.D. candidate Marie-France Marin] said. "It is interesting to note
    that we did not observe this phenomenon amongst the male participants."

    In a case of uncanny timing….

    Read the rest here.

  • Michael Savage Back on Radio Tonight

    Radio MicrophoneBy Selwyn Duke

    After a legal win that allowed him to leave his former employer
    last month, award-winning talk-show host Michael Savage will return to the
    airwaves tonight. Savage will have not just a new syndicator, Cumulus Media
    Networks, but also a new time slot, 9 p.m. to midnight Eastern Time. His
    previous slot was 6 to 9 p.m. Eastern.

    (more…)

  • Petulant, Perturbed Obama Just Can’t Help Himself

    Donkey-ElephantBy Selwyn Duke

    As with the vice-presidential debate and Joe Biden, Barack
    Obama’s attitude in Monday night’s debate spoke more clearly than anything he
    said. No, he didn’t laugh like Bozo the Clown, giggle like a schoolgirl, shake
    his head, and roll his eyes like Jokin’ Joe did. But he looked petulant, perturbed,
    and on edge (and was occasionally rude) throughout much of the night, despite three
    days of debate preparation at Camp David. It seems Barack Obama just can’t help
    himself.

    (more…)

Recent Comments

Categories

June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930