Senseless advice and nothing nice; that’s what
little-girls-in-combat policy is made of.
The obvious has already been said about placing women in front-line
combat positions. Their presence will reduce unit cohesiveness; male soldiers’
natural instinct to protect women will influence battlefield decisions; there
will be the problem of sexual impropriety within the ranks and of rape when
women are captured; women will have more trouble measuring up to the physical
and psychological demands of battle; special accommodations will no doubt be
made so that women may tend to feminine concerns; and, as the high pregnancy
rate aboard naval vessels has proven, having young men and women operate in
close quarters is folly. Yet the truth is that it was just a matter of time
before women were allowed in combat; it’s a piece that fits seamlessly into the
modern sex-role puzzle. And it’s not surprising if a majority of Americans
support the policy; they are sex-role puzzled.







