• Biden’s Strategy: Be a Jerk

    By Selwyn Duke

    Is there a human being on this Earth more obnoxious than Joe
    Biden? It appears that the following was his strategy in the vice-presidential
    debate:

    Okay, I’ll smile wide like a
    used-car salesman, shake my head and laugh while Paul Ryan is talking. This
    will give all watching the idea that everything he says is nonsense. The only
    other option is to actually support my side with real ideas, sound reasoning
    and appeals to virtue. I can’t do that!

    The other thing I need to do is
    make myself look assertive, like a real alpha male, by interrupting my opponent
    continuously. Hey, then if TOTUS and I lose the election, anyway, I may still
    be able to take a leaf out of Bob Dole’s book and do commercials for male
    enhancement—of course, in my case it would be testosterone booster.

    (more…)

  • Study: Young Americans Dumping Religion at Rapid Rate

    Religion-AtheismBy Selwyn Duke

    According to a recent study, religion is dying in America. And it’s a
    trend that has grave implications for our politics, culture, and the
    fate of our civilization. Ben Fearnow of CBS News reports on the story, writing:

    The number of Americans who do not
    identify with any religion continues to grow at a fast pace. One-fifth
    of the U.S. public — and a third of adults under 30 — are religiously
    unaffiliated today, the highest percentages ever in Pew Research Center
    polling.

    In the last five years alone, the
    unaffiliated have increased from just over 15 percent to just under 20
    percent of all U.S. adults. Their ranks now include more than 13 million
    self-described atheists and agnostics (nearly 6 percent of the U.S.
    public), as well as nearly 33 million people who say they have no
    particular religious affiliation (14 percent).

    The study also found that the “lower the age group, the less likely people are to be affiliated.”

    The study also posits some theories for this burgeoning
    irreligiosity, which, writes Fearnow, “run the gamut from a backlash
    against the entanglement of religion and politics to a global
    relationship between economic development and secularization.” Now, I
    don’t know if that “gamut” includes the obvious, but these two theories
    miss the mark.

    Read the rest here.

  • Judge: No Jail for Newborn’s Killer Because Abortion is Accepted

    Baby in WombBy Selwyn Duke

    When the great philosopher G.K. Chesterton said, “Let all the babies
    be born. Then let us drown those we do not like,” he wasn’t advocating
    infanticide but was just making a point. Unfortunately, though, we’re
    getting closer to a time when people would take his words literally. An
    example of this is a judge’s decision in Canada that a woman who
    strangled her newborn baby shouldn’t be incarcerated because Canadians’
    failure to criminalize abortion indicates that they “sympathize” with
    the mother.

    Lifesite News reports on the story, writing,
    “Katrina Effert of Wetaskiwin, Alberta gave birth secretly in her
    parents’ downstairs bathroom on April 13, 2005, and then later strangled
    the newborn and threw his body over a fence. She was 19 at the time.”

    Effert was subsequently convicted of second-degree
    murder. But this was overturned by the Alberta Court of Appeal, which
    reduced the charge to infanticide, punishable by no more than five years
    imprisonment. Yet when Effert appeared for sentencing before Justice
    Joanne Veit of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in September, even
    this punishment was deemed excessive. Instead, the judge gave Effert a
    three-year suspended sentence, which means that she won’t serve even one
    day in prison. Writes Lifesite News:

    Read the rest here.

  • Do We Want Mr. Nice Guy as President?

    Con ManBy Selwyn Duke

    Watching the debate on Wednesday, I truly can’t imagine
    Barack Obama having come off as the more likeable candidate. Continuously glancing
    downwards, perhaps looking for inspiration (I glance upwards, myself), and
    often displaying an angry countenance, he seemed stiff, detached and petulant;
    in contrast, Mitt Romney appeared energetic, nimble-minded, affable, engaged
    and engaging. It was the Mind vs. the Unkind.

    (more…)

  • The Debate: Obama’s Affirmative-action Performance

    By Selwyn Duke

    Hey, just blame it on Bush.

    The consensus on the presidential debate
    last night is that Barack Obama could resurrect the Choom Gang and star
    in a remake of Dazed and Confused. Conservative pundits are all aflutter with praise and liberals are all on Twitter with groans. Andrew Sullivan wrote,
    “Obama looked tired, even bored; he kept looking down; he had no crisp
    statements of passion or argument; he wasn't there.” A very upset
    Michael Moore tweeted, “This is what happens when u pick John Kerry as your debate coach.” And million-dollar-donor Bill Maher chimed in,
    “Obama made a lot of great points tonight. Unfortunately, most of them
    were for Romney.” Well, don’t feel too bad, guys. At least he did
    slightly better than when he debated Clint Eastwood.

    Chris Matthews, clearly perturbed that he’s lost that tingling feelin’, asked,
    “Where was Obama tonight? … What was he doing…?” Chris, he was doing
    what he always does: nothing well. It’s just that you’ve finally
    noticed.

    And now, after the Denver dose of reality, can we finally put to bed
    the myth of Obama the intellectually gifted? Yeah, I know, after eight
    years of a media narrative about Bush the cranially compromised, it was
    easy to say that, hey, now we’re getting the smart guy. As Joe Biden put
    it, “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is
    articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a
    storybook, man." Or, at least, that’s the story by the book — of cultural affirmative action (CAA).

    Read the rest here.

  • The Real Real Reason Romney is Losing

    Decadent HippiesBy Selwyn Duke

    According to the script, Barack Obama’s campaign should be leaking
    some serious oil. The economy is listing badly, with an anemic growth
    rate and a record 88 million Americans no longer in the labor force. The
    Middle East is spinning out of control, with anti-American riots and
    Islamists gaining power. Obama has exacerbated the racial divide at home
    with irresponsible rhetoric and policies, and diminished the United
    States abroad with apology tours and bows before potentates. His
    administration is ridden with scandal, from Fast and Furious to Solyndra
    to the rape of GM bondholders to Benghazi. He has stifled domestic job
    creation by opposing the Keystone Pipeline and prohibiting Gulf drilling
    while shipping jobs overseas by financing oil exploration in Brazil. He
    has increasingly acted undemocratically in ruling by executive decree
    and has trampled our long-held understanding of religious freedom with
    his contraception mandate. And this is a mere sampling of the
    transgressions of the most incompetent and corrupt presidency in
    American history.

    So Republicans are befuddled when they see Obama leading among
    voters. One common explanation is that the polls are rigged. And while
    they’re no doubt flawed and the race likely closer than they indicate,
    it’s unreasonable to think Obama isn’t at least slightly ahead of Mitt
    Romney; moreover, if Romney’s internal polls told a different story,
    he’d certainly trumpet them.

    The other common explanation is that Romney is a poor candidate, too
    ideologically weak, too stiff, too blue-blooded, and too hard to connect
    with. But to whom are we comparing him?

    Read the rest here.

  • 10 Horrible Leftists People Respect

    Demonic GirlBy Selwyn Duke

    While image isn’t really everything, it certainly appears so when
    it’s all people are allowed to see. What follows is a list of 10
    individuals who have Dr. Jekyll images that obscure a Mr. Hyde reality.

    1. Alice Walker

    While The Color Purple author and feminist icon masquerades
    as a champion of women, the woman she should have cared about most in
    her life, her own daughter, Rebecca, she viewed as a “millstone” around
    her neck.

    As Rebecca reveals,
    her mother called her birth a “calamity” and would leave her in the
    care of others or to fend for herself while she was still a child. Her
    mother drummed into her head that motherhood was slavery, but was happy
    when she became sexually active at 13 — Alice fancied it “empowering.”
    And while she was “supportive” when Rebecca had an abortion at age 14,
    this changed when Rebecca decided to become a mother as an adult. In
    fact, Rebecca’s rejection of the culture of death led to a spat that
    ended when, writes Rebecca, “she wrote me a letter saying that our
    relationship had been inconsequential for years and that she was no
    longer interested in being my mother. She even signed the letter with
    her first name, rather than 'Mom'.”

    But, hey, I’m sure Alice Walker has read It Takes a Village.

    2. Alfred Kinsey

    It’s not just that this bug researcher turned self-proclaimed human-sexuality expert was a scientific fraud.

    Read the rest here.

  • How Government Will Take Meat off Your Table

    Plate of RibsBy Selwyn Duke

    The British pork industry is collapsing, and it’s a story that should
    serve as a warning to all of us. Why? Because the agents of its demise
    have the entire West in their crosshairs.

    The numbers are staggering. With a pig herd halved during the last
    decade, Britain has gone from producing 110 percent of its domestic
    consumption of pork to only 40 percent. This is due to many of the
    nation’s pig farmers having left the business, and they’re poised to be
    joined by 100 more this year, which represents “10% of Britain's small
    to medium-sized producers,” reports the Guardian. Consequently, it’s predicted that domestic production will decline another 20 percent by Christmas.

    Britain’s pork farmers’ woes have been worsened by the droughts in
    the United States, which have increased the cost of feed. But what’s the
    source of their underlying problems? If you guessed government, go to
    the head of the class. As the Financial Times writes, “UK farmers are part of a global trend as the cost of feed and compliance with welfare regulations hits suppliers worldwide.”

    The “regulations” in question are animal-welfare regulations….

    Read the rest here.

  • The Election: What’s “Like” Got to Do With It?

    376550_blogBy Selwyn Duke

    “I like Obama,” said a man I know of when explaining his support for
    the president. His sentiment isn’t unusual, as Barack Obama is, we’re
    told, a likeable man. In contrast, we hear that people have trouble
    “connecting” with Mitt Romney, that he’s an overly-starched blueblood
    who can’t relate to the common man.

    Of course, it’s hard for people to connect with you when the only
    connection they have to what you say and do is through a media that
    hates you. In contrast, when that same media smoothes out your rough
    edges and whites out damning comments you make, it’s a lot easier to be
    likeable. This certainly is the case with Obama, a man who has called traditionalist Americans “enemies,” said
    that they “cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't
    like them…,” and considered his brief time in the corporate world as a
    case of “working for the enemy” (he seems to have a very unlikeable
    habit of viewing fellow Americans as “enemies”). And based on what I’ve
    heard through the grapevine, the real Obama exudes an arrogance that’s
    anything but appealing.

    Let’s say, however, that I’m wrong and Obama is just the most affable
    bloke around. Is this really meaningful? Could it even be a red flag?

    Read the rest here.

  • When Michelle Obama Starts Starving the Kids

    Chained RefrigeratorBy Selwyn Duke

    Unprecedented school-lunch regulations have just gone into effect,
    and they suggest a new answer to the question “Where’s the beef?”: not
    on students’ plates— or on their bones. The regulations are a result of
    Michelle Obama’s “Healthy and Hunger Free Kids Act,” which was passed by
    the lame-duck, Democrat-controlled Congress in December 2010. And the
    result has been wasted food, endangered health, and hungrier kids.

    The problem is that, in typical nanny-state style, the regulations
    not only prescribe foods many children find unpalatable, they also apply
    unrealistic calorie restrictions on students: “650 calories for
    elementary-schoolers, 700 for middle-schoolers and 850 for
    high-schoolers,” writes Suzanne Tobias of the Wichita Eagle.

    Yet more perspective is gained when you consider that the
    government’s dietary limitations wouldn’t be out of place in a wartime
    prison camp. For example, writes
    PJ Media, “Current regulations limit servings of protein, which could
    be anything from a hamburger to a side of beans, to 1.5 ounces two days a
    week and 2 ounces the other three days.”

    Read the rest here.

Recent Comments

Categories

September 2026
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930